no thanks hollywood, i ain’t in to that…

camera eyeis not the term “movie” an antiquated and witless relic of a less kinetic time? what of substance can be said of the annual gladiatorial game of motion picture performance colloquially known as the oscars? nothing, for that which lacks substance cannot be accounted for with substance any more than art can compete. nonetheless why has any pat on the back taken on such an ostentatious and overblown countenance when the knife in the back has so much more staying power to affect change? what can be said about a change agent if its success must be taken notice of? perhaps the change is not so significant, if at all, and hardly worth the recognition.

Leave a Reply