Archive for the 'bonvivant' Category
Tuesday, July 13th, 2010
some drink and get sad. some drink and cry. some drink and get angry. some drink and say gay people take it up the ass. some drink and call police officers ’sugar tits’. some drink and assert the jews are responsible for all the wars in the world. some drink and beat their girlfriends because [...]
Posted in binaries, celluloid | No Comments »
Friday, October 16th, 2009
finally it has been said aloud was has been apparent for years by an authority of the body no less, one of chicago’s finest, roger ebert:
” i am happy to say it brings back an element sadly missing in recent movies, gratuitous nudity. sexy women would ‘happen’ to be topless in the 1970s movies for [...]
Posted in celluloid, raison d'etre | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 9th, 2008
“people, i just want to say, you know, can we all get along?“
unequivically the answer is “no” if a fraternal bond is shared between your guitarist and vocalist while happening to be a black crowe, oasis or kink. again there be a “nay” if your brothers bee gibb whereas the deleos and maddens carry on [...]
Posted in gravy train, verse | No Comments »
Tuesday, February 27th, 2007
is not the term “movie” an antiquated and witless relic of a less kinetic time? what of substance can be said of the annual gladiatorial game of motion picture performance colloquially known as the oscars? nothing, for that which lacks substance cannot be accounted for with substance any more than art can compete. nonetheless why [...]
Posted in celluloid, raison d'etre | No Comments »
Tuesday, February 27th, 2007
the assertion of choice is nothing without pride yet millions of smokers cower from the frost and inclemency while huddling around slightly ajar portals dangling fags in the freeze. six feet under and with the choice, the marlboro man puffs away without cracking open his casket but the modern smoker has devolved to be mild [...]
Posted in bonvivant, indentment | No Comments »
Saturday, December 16th, 2006
man and himself expressed for himself, about himself and made into an artifact for his pleasure rightly is called art. a paleolithic frank scrawling a record of experience on a cave wall so as to stop time and space for himself is genuinely artistic whereas the claptrap of the historically defined artist is nothing more [...]
Posted in bonvivant, creationism, raison d'etre | No Comments »
Monday, October 30th, 2006
isn’t it odd that a boy can be turned into this? how is it that franklin’s journey to tinseltown returns him as this? when is a king not fit for a queen but rather just bad company? sometimes family is not a fit substitute, but all of this probably makes sense when it is realized [...]
Posted in verse | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 20th, 2006
barren from any serialized parchment and ink publications are ‘it’ and ‘you’ while ‘i’ and ‘us’ fruitfully multiple unchecked in the daily, weekly and monthly warrens. quaint in its naiveté, objectivity was at least a clever game of cat and mouse between columnist and audience in which purported empiricism purred forth waiting to catch unsuspecting [...]
Posted in opination, prose, vainglory | No Comments »
Wednesday, August 9th, 2006
can there be an any more amusing pop culture precept today than the idea of “keeping it real”? how is it “keeping it real” means being able to hold to two mutually exclusive lifestyles, such as street thug and bonvivant of expensive sparkling wines or celebuskank and undefiled? keeping it real amongst breast augmentation, elective [...]
Posted in bonvivant, vainglory | No Comments »
Saturday, August 5th, 2006
…and don henley should know, being in the eagles.
Posted in raison d'etre, verse | No Comments »